Bob from Oconomowoc, WI
In response to Dean from Leavenworth, the NFC West is a juggernaut and the Packers will be playing all of them. At Arizona and SF…again. I'm happy Seattle and LA have to visit Lambeau. They should all be quality games. I wouldn't call any games this season easy but dang do some stretches of the schedule look daunting.
Yes, but the Packers aren't too shabby, either. They're the daunting part of many teams' schedules, as well.
Nick from Plainwell, MI
With Randy Ramsey possibly out to start the year, does Gutey look towards Clay Matthews as a possible rotation guy? I don't know if he's at the point in his career to still be a starter somewhere or if he would take a pay cut and rotate at a chance for a ring. A reunion with Coach Barry doesn't sound like a bad deal either.
While never say never (see: Cobb, Randall), I'm not holding my breath. I'm confident Matthews could've played last year if he wanted to, but my guess is there wasn't a contract that made sense for Clay at this point of his career.
Steve from Toronto, Canada
With rosters now coming into clearer focus, which stretch of the schedule now stands out as the most critical? I myself see Weeks 8-12: at Cards, at Chiefs, vs. Seahawks, at Vikes, vs. Rams – as the deciding gauntlet. Seattle, KC, and LA are SB contenders, Arizona's arrow is pointing straight up, and a game at a raucous U.S. Bank Stadium will always be tough. What say you?
It's that November stretch for me, too, with road games in Kansas City and Minnesota, and home games against the formidable Seahawks and Rams. It's high risk and high reward. If the Packers can weather that stretch, they have a Week 13 bye and then three of their last five at home.
Bill from Wilmington, DE
Wes, Mike mentioned Jonathan Garvin a couple times Friday. What are your thoughts on him? Seems he has great upside, especially at 22 years old.
He's a big dude with a lot of athleticism. My scouting report ends there because Garvin was a healthy scratch through the second half of the year. We just didn't see much of him. Like many others, the preseason will be big for Garvin.
Brian from Sussex, WI
Correct me if I'm wrong, but for a player to be eligible to come off IR in the season they have to be on the 53-man roster when placed on IR. I assume Mike's comment about Randy Ramsey starting on IR has him first making the initial 53, which means another player initially is cut with intent to bring back hoping another team doesn't claim them.
This is correct. The Packers would have to keep Ramsey through the initial cut to 53 before placing him on IR for him to be eligible to return this season.
Duane from Oak Creek, WI
Do you think we carry three QBs into the season?
That depends on how Kurt Benkert looks this preseason. Fortunately for Benkert – and many young QBs around the league – there no longer are limits on practice-squad eligibility. The fact the Packers felt comfortable enough to proceed with just Benkert as the No. 3 before camp shows they're committed to his development whether it comes with him on the 53 or the practice squad.
https://www.packers.com/news/inbox-charles-woodson-elevated-the-game-of-football
2021-08-07 13:02:23Z
CBMiUGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnBhY2tlcnMuY29tL25ld3MvaW5ib3gtY2hhcmxlcy13b29kc29uLWVsZXZhdGVkLXRoZS1nYW1lLW9mLWZvb3RiYWxs0gEA
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Inbox: Charles Woodson elevated the game of football - Packers.com - Packers.com"
Post a Comment